#28 Fix Portscan.py default case

Слито
carlos.garcia слито 1 коммит(ов) из stefan.schmidt/fix-portscan-offbyone в SPIN/master 6 лет назад
Stefan Schmidt прокомментировал 6 лет назад

As briefly discussed in the meeting, the default case (when not specifying any parameters) in the portscan-attack only scanned 891 ports instead of the 1000 it was supposed to. The problems I found are two off-by-one errors in line 101 and 102: when using range(0,9) the generated numbers don't include the nine, the same goes for the array slicing. This resulted in 9*99=891 packets being generated instead of 1000.

As briefly discussed in the meeting, the default case (when not specifying any parameters) in the portscan-attack only scanned 891 ports instead of the 1000 it was supposed to. The problems I found are two off-by-one errors in line 101 and 102: when using range(0,9) the generated numbers don't include the nine, the same goes for the array slicing. This resulted in 9*99=891 packets being generated instead of 1000.
Слияние этого запроса успешно завершено!
Войдите, чтобы присоединиться к обсуждению.
Нет меток
Bug
Нет этапа
Нет ответственного
1 участников
Загрузка...
Отмена
Сохранить
Пока нет содержимого.