#28 Fix Portscan.py default case

Fusionado
carlos.garcia fusionadas 1 achegas de stefan.schmidt/fix-portscan-offbyone en SPIN/master %!s(int64=6) %!d(string=hai) anos

As briefly discussed in the meeting, the default case (when not specifying any parameters) in the portscan-attack only scanned 891 ports instead of the 1000 it was supposed to. The problems I found are two off-by-one errors in line 101 and 102: when using range(0,9) the generated numbers don't include the nine, the same goes for the array slicing. This resulted in 9*99=891 packets being generated instead of 1000.

As briefly discussed in the meeting, the default case (when not specifying any parameters) in the portscan-attack only scanned 891 ports instead of the 1000 it was supposed to. The problems I found are two off-by-one errors in line 101 and 102: when using range(0,9) the generated numbers don't include the nine, the same goes for the array slicing. This resulted in 9*99=891 packets being generated instead of 1000.
Este pull request completouse con éxito!
Accede para unirte á conversa.
Sen etiquetas
Bug
Sen fito
Sen asignado
1 participantes
Cargando...
Cancelar
Gardar
Aínda non existe contido.