stakeholders.tex 5.2 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129
  1. Everyone who is affected by a hybrid extension to an \ac{OSN} has interests which should be considered. These so-called stakeholders can be people, groups or organizations which have the same opinion and the same goals. In the case of an \ac{OSN}, there is a service provider who operates the platform. The users are split into those who care about their privacy and therefore want to use a hybrid solution and those who just want to use the \ac{OSN} as it is. The developers of the hybrid solution have interests as well, and lastly, the government is highly interested that law and order are respected.
  2. Even if the stakeholders are not necessarily directly involved in the development process of a hybrid solution, it is still essential to understand the views and interests of the various parties and take them into account. Table \ref{tab:steakholders} shows the interests and points of view of the parties involved directly and indirectly with the hybrid extension of the \ac{OSN}.
  3. % Interests
  4. \newcommand{\interestsSP}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  5. \begin{itemize}
  6. \item Collect as much user data as possible
  7. \item Binding users to the platform
  8. \item Profit maximization
  9. \end{itemize}
  10. \end{minipage}}
  11. \newcommand{\interestsOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  12. \begin{itemize}
  13. \item Unrestricted use of the \ac{OSN}
  14. \item No disadvantages due to hybrid \ac{OSN} users
  15. \end{itemize}
  16. \end{minipage}}
  17. \newcommand{\interestsHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  18. \begin{itemize}
  19. \item Unrestricted use of the \ac{OSN}
  20. \item Decision-making sovereignty over what happens with data
  21. \end{itemize}
  22. \end{minipage}}
  23. \newcommand{\interestsDevHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  24. \begin{itemize}
  25. \item Scalable, secure, fast data exchange solution
  26. \item No costs for infrastructure and development
  27. \end{itemize}
  28. \end{minipage}}
  29. \newcommand{\interestsGov}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  30. \begin{itemize}
  31. \item Compliance with laws
  32. \item Supervision
  33. \item Censorship
  34. \end{itemize}
  35. \end{minipage}}
  36. % Attitude towards hybrid OSN
  37. \newcommand{\attitudeSP}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.3\textwidth}
  38. \begin{itemize}
  39. \item Negative, as undesirable
  40. \end{itemize}
  41. \end{minipage}}
  42. \newcommand{\attitudeOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.3\textwidth}
  43. \begin{itemize}
  44. \item Neutral
  45. \end{itemize}
  46. \end{minipage}}
  47. \newcommand{\attitudeHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.3\textwidth}
  48. \begin{itemize}
  49. \item Positive, as desired
  50. \end{itemize}
  51. \end{minipage}}
  52. \newcommand{\attitudeDevHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.3\textwidth}
  53. \begin{itemize}
  54. \item Positive
  55. \end{itemize}
  56. \end{minipage}}
  57. \newcommand{\attitudeGov}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.3\textwidth}
  58. \begin{itemize}
  59. \item Depending on policy and legislation
  60. \item At best, positive and supportive
  61. \item In the worst case, negative and preventing
  62. \end{itemize}
  63. \end{minipage}}
  64. %Influence on hybrid OSN
  65. \newcommand{\influenceSP}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  66. \begin{itemize}
  67. \item No direct influence on the hybrid solution
  68. \item By identification of the hybrid \ac{OSN} users their exclusion
  69. \item Blocking the hybrid \ac{OSN}
  70. \item Great influence
  71. \end{itemize}
  72. \end{minipage}}
  73. \newcommand{\influenceOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  74. \begin{itemize}
  75. \item No influence
  76. \end{itemize}
  77. \end{minipage}}
  78. \newcommand{\influenceHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  79. \begin{itemize}
  80. \item Feedback for improvement
  81. \item Low influence
  82. \end{itemize}
  83. \end{minipage}}
  84. \newcommand{\influenceDevHOSN}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  85. \begin{itemize}
  86. \item Great influence, since decision-making sovereignty
  87. \end{itemize}
  88. \end{minipage}}
  89. \newcommand{\influenceGov}{\begin{minipage} [t] {0.4\textwidth}
  90. \begin{itemize}
  91. \item At best, promotion and financial support - great influence
  92. \item In the worst case legal action - great influence
  93. \item No other influence
  94. \end{itemize}
  95. \end{minipage}}
  96. \begin{landscape}
  97. \begin{table}[h!]
  98. \centering
  99. \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
  100. \hline
  101. \textbf{Steakholder} & \textbf{Interests} & \textbf{Attitude towards hybrid \ac{OSN}} & \textbf{Influence on hybrid \ac{OSN}} \\ \hline
  102. \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Service\\ Provider\end{tabular} & \interestsSP & \attitudeSP & \influenceSP \\ \hline
  103. \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}OSN\\ User\end{tabular} & \interestsOSN & \attitudeOSN & \influenceOSN \\ \hline
  104. \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Hybrid\\ OSN User\end{tabular} & \interestsHOSN & \attitudeHOSN & \influenceHOSN \\ \hline
  105. \begin{tabular}[c]{@{}l@{}}Developer\\ hybrid OSN\end{tabular} & \interestsDevHOSN & \attitudeDevHOSN & \influenceDevHOSN \\ \hline
  106. Governments & \interestsGov & \attitudeGov & \influenceGov \\ \hline
  107. \end{tabular}
  108. \caption{The table shows the interests, attitudes towards and influence on the hybrid solution of several stakeholders.}
  109. \label{tab:steakholders}
  110. \end{table}
  111. \end{landscape}