Browse Source

Add references for the Facebook Cambridge Analytica incident

Carsten Porth 5 years ago
parent
commit
58cd14a5e8
2 changed files with 19 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 18 0
      thesis/bib/bibliography.bib
  2. 1 1
      thesis/content/05-proof-of-concept/osn-selection.tex

+ 18 - 0
thesis/bib/bibliography.bib

@@ -272,4 +272,22 @@
   note         = {Online, accessed 21.03.2019},
 }
 
+@Misc{facebook2018api-restriction,
+  author       = {Mike Schroepfer},
+  title        = {{An Update on Our Plans to Restrict Data Access on Facebook}},
+  howpublished = {\url{https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/restricting-data-access/}},
+  month        = apr,
+  year         = {2018},
+  note         = {Online, accessed 21.03.2019},
+}
+
+@Misc{facebook2018cambridge-analytica,
+  author       = {Paul Grewal},
+  title        = {{Suspending Cambridge Analytica and SCL Group From Facebook}},
+  howpublished = {\url{https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/03/suspending-cambridge-analytica/}},
+  month        = mar,
+  year         = {2018},
+  note         = {Online, accessed 21.03.2019},
+}
+
 @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}

+ 1 - 1
thesis/content/05-proof-of-concept/osn-selection.tex

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-When selecting a suitable \ac{OSN} for the development of a hybrid client, Facebook was the obvious first choice due to the numerous negative headlines about data protection. With over 2.3 billion users per month (average Q4 2018), it is currently the most widely used social network in the world \cite{facebook2019reportq4}. In the recent past, it has often been criticized for its handling of its users' data. In particular, the scandal surrounding the data analysis company Cambridge Analytica, which had access to the data of up to 87 million users, hit Facebook hard. As a result, CEO Mark Zuckerberg had to face the US Congress and the EU Parliament in question rounds and did not leave a good impression by avoiding many questions. As a result of this scandal, there were further restrictions to the Facebook \ac{API}.
+When selecting a suitable \ac{OSN} for the development of a hybrid client, Facebook was the obvious first choice due to the numerous negative headlines about data protection. With over 2.3 billion users per month (average Q4 2018), it is currently the most widely used social network in the world \cite{facebook2019reportq4}. In the recent past, it has often been criticized for its handling of its users' data. In particular, the scandal surrounding the data analysis company Cambridge Analytica, which had access to the data of up to 87 million users, hit Facebook hard \cite{facebook2018cambridge-analytica,facebook2018api-restriction}. As a result, CEO Mark Zuckerberg had to face the US Congress and the EU Parliament in question rounds and did not leave a good impression by avoiding many questions. As a result of this scandal, there were further restrictions to the Facebook \ac{API} \cite{facebook2018api-restriction}.
 
 However, the Facebook \ac{API} is not suitable for developing a new client. The functionalities provided by the \ac{API} offer the possibility to develop an app that can be used within Facebook, for example for a game. So, it is not possible to give a \enquote{Like} for a post through this \ac{API}, which is part of the core functionality of a Facebook client. As discussed in Chapter \ref{ch:concept}, it is possible to access the data through crawling. However, the constant and rapid development would make this an arduous undertaking. Facebook writes in a blog post that the code changes every few hours \cite{facebook2017release}. Therefore it is almost impossible to adjust the crawler fast enough and roll out the adjusted code.